Ds Scholarship

UK’s biggest exam board apologises for ‘confusion’ and ‘stress’ after A-Level law students were tested on unexpected tort topic

😲 Rylands v Fletcher 😲

The UK’s biggest exam board has apologised to A-Level law students after giving them a question on a topic they did not think they had to revise.

The exam, with up to 100 marks available, included two questions worth 30 marks each, with students given advance information on the focus of the exam in order to mitigate the impact of the pandemic.

However, AQA’s pre-assessment info included the topic of one of the 30-mark questions — but not the other. The other topic, worth almost one third of pupils’ overall mark, centerd on liability for nuisance under the case law classic of Rylands v Fletcher.

“One of the aims of advance information is that it shouldn’t narrow teaching and learning, so we couldn’t list all the topics on the exam paper,” a spokesperson for the AQA said in a statement. “Although we advised students to revise all topics and included the focus of one of the two 30-mark questions, we appreciate that many students expected us to include the focus of both questions — especially in light of guidance we gave before we released the advance information.”

The 2022 Legal Check SQE Providers List

They continued: “We didn’t mean to cause any confusion or stress for students and we’re sorry that we did.”

On how the exam will now be noted, AQA said it will look at the results achieved by students and “take any action necessary to protect them.”

The law exam confusion comes just a little over a week after the AQA apologised to students sitting a GCSE physics paper for including a question on a question that had been ruled out in the topic information.

SSO and Login Info – School of Medicine, UC San Diego

By utilizing your UCSD TritonLink Single Sign-On credentials along with Duo Two-Step authentication,...

GWU defends Justice Clarence Thomas as students call for removal

Placeholder while article actions loadGeorge Washington University rejected calls to remove Supreme Court...


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here